Media critique quick sheet
1. News stories
When critiquing a news story about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, ask yourself the following questions:
- How many times were UN reports/findings/resolutions mentioned?
- How many times were Human Rights reports/findings/statements mentioned?
- Were the terms "occupation/occupied" used appropriately?
- Were maps depicting the offered Palestinian state shown?
- Was Barak's "95%" figure used to describe the Barak “offers”?
- How many times was the words "terror/terrorist" used to describe Palestinians/Palestinian actions vs. Israelis/Israeli actions?
- How many times was the word "violence" used to describe Palestinian actions vs. Israeli actions?
- Were the words "response/retaliation" used to describe Palestinian/Israeli actions?
- Were Palestinian actions described in context (e.g., "Palestinians launched a mortar attack after Israelis bulldozed a row of houses")?
- Were Israeli actions described in context (e.g., "Israelis bulldozed a row of houses after Palestinians launched a mortar attack")?
- Did the story describe official Palestinian denials/pleas of ignorance and innocence in violent acts?
- Did the story describe official Israelis denials/pleas of ignorance and innocence in violent acts?
- How much personal detail about Palestinian victims did the story go into?
- How much personal detail about Israeli victims did the story go into?
- Did the story appropriately use the word "alleged"?
- Did the story appropriately use double quotes?
- How many direct Palestinian/Israeli quotes did the story include?
2. Editorials
When reading an editorial, ask yourself the following basic questions:
- Did the editorial mention the fact that the Palestinians are under Israeli occupation?
- Did the editorial mention findings by human rights organizations
- Did the editorial mention United Nations resolutions/findings
- Did the editorial lament the suffering of Palestinian people
- Did the editorial mention the fact that Israel is recipient of significant military and economic aid from the United States?
3. Interviews
The following are the 10 worst practices that most talk show hosts are guilty of when interviewing Palestinian or pro-Palestinian spokespersons:
- Being rude to pro-Palestinian interviewees, but always remaining respectful when speaking to the pro-Israelis: often, Palestinians are cutt off in mid-sentence, lectured, often voices are raised against them in anger or irritation – even if the speaker is a respected Palestinian official (e.g., Paula Zahn of CNN cutting off Hanan Ashrawi or raising her voice in anger against Edward Said).[1]
- Always asking pro-Palestinians challenging questions, but rarely doing the same for the pro-Israelis: a pro-Palestinian may be asked: why did the Palestinians spurn the Barak offer?; but a pro-Israeli is never asked: why should the Palestinians accept a state that is made up of four disconnected areas?
- Never asking the Israelis some very basic questions: why did Israel double the size of settlements in the Occupied territories between 1993 and 200 if it really wanted peace?, why won't Israel accept an international observation force?, how can Sharon call on Arafat to stop terrorism and yet at the same time destroy the very instruments that he needs to fight it?
- Often bringing in many more pro-Israeli voices than pro-Palestinian voices: and often starting interviews with pro-Palestinians and giving the pro-Israelis the last word.
- Rarely interviewing a non-Palestinian/non-Arab supporter of the Palestinian cause: even though very qualified scholars and activists do exist.
- Rarely bringing pro-Palestinian Israelis: while giving ample time to Arab/Muslim pro-Israel establishment apologists such as Joseph Farah and Fouad Ajami.
- Non-disclosure: bringing in notorious pro-Israelis and presenting them as objective analysts – e.g., Daniel Pipes, Steve Emerson, Dennis Ross.[2]
- Blatantly loading questions: as in, why is Arafat letting Hamas engage in terror? or, will Sharon abandon his policy of restraint?
- Interviewing Americans: rarely seeking a Palestinian-American living in the Occupied Territories for interviews and reactions, while often seeking out Israeli-Americans living in Israel.
- Focus on suffering: rarely, if ever, having the interview be focused on Palestinian suffering and what the Israelis need to do to stop it, but often having the interview be about the terror Israelis are suffering and what the Palestinians need to do about it.
[1] See: http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/cast/paulazahn.asp
[2] “Dennis Ross is no wise elder statesman: time for full disclosure by media about their guests and writers”, Palestine Media Watch, March 16, 2002 – See: http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/cast/ross.asp
|