For other survival
kits, please go to the PMWatch Snake Bite
Kit.
THE BIG QUESTIONS. 1
THINGS TO HARP ON.. 1
ON NEWS COVERAGE. 2
ON EDITORIAL COVERAGE. 2
UNFAIR INTERVIEW PRACTICES BY THE
US MEDIA.. 2
REVEALING DID YOU KNOW QUESTIONS?. 3
1. Israel
has been "cracking down" against terrorism for three
decades now, and yet to this day suicide bombings continue to
take place -- why does Israel continue following a policy that
is patently a failure?
2. If
Israel were serious about a long-lasting peace with the Palestinians,
then why did it double the size of its settlements in the occupied
territories between 1993 and 2000?
3. For
the whole of 1999, not one single Israel was killed in a terrorist
attack. If Palestinians were only intent on destroying
Israel, then why did attacks against Israelis taper off to nothing
when Barak seemed to be making progress towards peace?
4. If
Israel really wants Arafat to reign in militants, as it says it
does, then why does it make it both politically and physically
impossible for him to do so by humiliating him, denouncing him
as a criminal, and physically dismantling his security apparatus
and the infrastructure of his authority?
5. If
Israel were really interested in ensuring the security of its
citizens, then why does it carry out assassinations, knowing full
well that such assassinations will only trigger another wave of
suicide bombings and escalate the cycle of violence?
- 1. Israel allots 85% of the water resources in
the occupied territories for Jews and the remaining 15% is divided
among all Palestinians in the territories. For example in Hebron,
85% of the water is given to about 500 settlers, while 15% must
be divided among Hebron's 120,000 Palestinians?
- 2. More than 80% of Palestinians killed are civilians
who had nothing to do with terrorism
- 3. There are no more than 6,000 Israeli settlers
in Gaza, surrounded by 1,000,000 Palestinians, and yet, 25%
of Gazan land is set aside for the settlers – one milliong Palestinians
are choking to death just so
that 6,000 settlers may illegally live deep inside Palestinian
territory
- 4. Hebron is kept under constant "curfew"
-- i.e., Palestinians are physically confined to their homes
23 out of 24 hours -- simply so that Israel can guarantee the
security of 450 settlers living among 120,000 Palestinians
- 5. At his most "generous", Ehud Barak
offered a Palestinian state composed of 4 disconnected territories,
with the proviso that the Palestinian state retain in its midst
hundreds of thousands of Israeli citizens, and that the settlements
where those citizens were to live would be guarded by the Israeli
army, with the territory of the army bases being Israeli sovereign
territory
- 6. Only two nations in the world oppose the International
Treaty on Terrorism: The United States and Israel
- 7. Israel allows anyone who is Jewish to "return"
to Israel, even if they, and all of their ancestors going back
hundreds or thousand sof years, had never been in Israel, and
yet denies Palestinians with valid land deeds to return to their
their home towns, their villages, their houses
- 8. Israel has a stated policy of ensuring that
its population must retain a Jewish majority: how can Israel
be a democracy and yet pursue a race-based policy?
- 9. Israel has been "cracking down" against
terrorism for three decades now, and yet to this day suicide
bombings continue to take place -- why does Israel continue
following a policy that is patently a failure?
- 10. If Israel were serious about a long-lasting
peace with the Palestinians, then why did it double the size
of its settlments in the occupied territories between 1993 and
2000?
- 11. If Palestinians were only intent on destroying
Israel, then why did attacks against Israelis taper off to nothing
when Barak seemed to be making progress towards peace?
- 12. If Israel really wants Arafat to reign in militants,
as it says it does, then why does it make it both politically
and physically impossible for him to do so by humiliating him,
dennouncing him as a criminal, and physically dismantling his
security aparatus and the infrastructure of his authority?
- 13. If Israel were really interested in ensuring
the security of its citizens, then why does it carry out assassinations,
knowing full well that such assassinations will only trigger
another wave of suicide bombings and escalate the cycle of violence?
- 1. Lack of quote space in stories from Palestinian
civilians
- 2. Use of “retaliation”/“response” when describing
Israeli actions
- 3. Never using “retaliation”/“response” when describing
Palestinian actions
- 4. NEVER reporting on exactly what Barak or Clinton
offered the Palestinians, instead repeating the figure “%95”
- 5. NEVER showing maps depicting the Israeli offers
- 6. Rarely using the word “occupied” when describing
WB/Gaza/Jerusalem
- 7. Not describing Gilo as a settlement but as a
suburb/neighborhood
- 8. Using the word “terrorist” for Palestinians
but not for Israelis
- 9. Humanizing Israeli deaths but not Palestinian
deaths
- 10. More photographs of Israeli civilian suffering
and not as many for Palestinians
- 11. Using the word “crossfire” to explain cause
of death of Palestinians --- but never using it to describe
Israeli deaths
- 12. Minimizing Palestinian cooperation, and maximizing
Israeli cooperation
- 13. Rarely quoting the Palestinian Authority but
always quoting the Israeli government and army
- 14. Not mentioning Ariel Sharon’s war crimes
- 1. The great discrepancy between the amount of
space give to pro-Israeli columns vs pro-Palestinian rights
columns: usually, and 8-1 ratio: the NYTimes gives 80% of its
column space to pro-Israeli voices, and less than 10% to pro-Palestinian
voices
- 2. Absence from mention of human rights findings
in editorials
- 3. Absence from mention of UN findings in editorials
- 4. The myths about the wars are repeated in editorials
- 5. The myth about Israel being an underdog is repeated
in editorials
- 1. Being
rude, condescending, disrespectful to pro-Palestinian interviewees,
but always remaining respectful when speaking to the pro-Israelis:
often, Palestinians are cut off in mid-sentence, lectured, often
voices are raised against them in anger or irritation -- even
if the speaker is a respected Palestinian official (e.g., Paula
Zahn of CNN cutting off Hanan Ashrawi or raising her voice in
anger against Edward Said)
- 2. Always asking pro-Palestinians challenging
questions, but rarely doing the same for the pro-Israelis:
a pro-Palestinian may be asked: why did the Palestinians spurn
the Barak offer?, but a pro-Israeli is never asked: why should
the Palestinians accept a state that is made up of four disconnected
areas, or: if Israel is truly interested in peace, why did it
double the size of settlements while negotiating peace?
- 3. Never asking the Israelis some very basic
questions: why did Israel double the size of settlements
in the Occupied territories between 1993 and 200?, why won't
Israel accept an international observation force?, how can Sharon
call on Arafat to stop terrorism and yet at the same time destroy
the very instruments that he needs to fight it?
- 4. Often bringing in many more pro-Israeli voices
than pro-Palestinian voices , and Often starting interviews
with pro-Palestinians and giving the pro-Israelis the last word
- 5. Rarely interviewing a non-Palestinian/non-Arab
supporter of the Palestinian cause, while often interviewing
non-Israeli pro-Israel speakers, even though very qualified
scholars and activists do exist
- 6. Rarely bringing pro-Palestinian Israelis
(while giving ample time to Arab/Muslim establishment apologists
such as Ajami, Zakariya, Ijazi)
- 7. Bringing in notorious pro-Israelis and presenting
them as objective analysts -- e.g., Daniel Pipes, Steve
Emerson
- 8. Blatantly loading questions: as in, why
is Arafat letting Hamas engage in terror? or, will Sharon abandon
his policy of restraint?
- 9. Rarely seeking a Palestinian-American living
in the Occupied Territories for interviews and reactions,
while often seeking out Israeli-Americans living in Israel
- 10. Rarely, if ever, having the interview be
focused on Palestinian suffering and what the Israelis need
to do to stop it, but often having the interview be about
the terror Israelis are suffering and what the Palestinians
need to do about it
1
- THAT, when the Palestine Problem was created by Britain in 1917,
more than 90% of the population of Palestine were Arabs, and that
there were at that time no more than 56,000 Jews in Palestine?
2
- THAT, more than half of the Jews living in Palestine at that
time were recent immigrants, who had come to Palestine in the
preceding decades in order to escape persecution in Europe?...
And that less than 5% of the population of Palestine were native
Palestinian Jews?
3
- THAT, the Arabs of Palestine at that time owned 97.5% of the
land, while Jews (native Palestinians and recent immigrants together)
owned only 2.5% of the land?
4
- THAT, during the thirty years of British occupation and rule,
the Zionists were able to purchase only 3.5% of the land of Palestine,
in spite of the encouragement of the British Government?... And
that much of this land was transferred to Zionist bodies by the
British Government directly, and was not sold by Arab owners?
5
- THAT, therefore, when British passed the Palestine Problem to
the United Nations in 1947, Zionists owned no more than 6% of
the total land area of Palestine?
6
- THAT, notwithstanding these facts, the General Assembly of the
United Nations recommended that a "Jewish State" be
established in Palestine?... And that the Assembly granted that
proposed "State" about 54% of the total area of the
country?
7
- THAT, Israel immediately occupied (and still occupies) 80.48%
of the total land area of Palestine?
8
- THAT, this territorial expansion took place, for the most part,
before 15 May 1948: i.e., before the formal end of the British
forces from Palestine, before the entry of Arab armies to protect
Palestinian Arabs, and before the Arab-Israeli war?
9
- THAT, the 1947 recommendation of the General Assembly in favor
of the creation of a "Jewish State" was outside the
competence of the Assembly under the Charter of the United Nations?
10
- THAT, all attempts by the Arab States and other Asian countries
to have the Assembly submit “the question of constitutionality"
of its recommendation to the International Court of Justice for
an "advisory opinion" by the Court were rejected or
ignored by the Assembly?
11
- THAT, when the Assembly began to experience "second thoughts"
over the matter and convened for its second special session in
1948, it failed to reaffirm the 1947 recommendation for the partition
of Palestine-thus destroying whatever dubious legality that recommendation
for the establishment of a "Jewish State" had had?
12
- THAT, that original 1947 recommendation to create a "Jewish
State" in Palestine was approved, at the first vote, only
by European, American and Australian States...for every Asian
State, and every African State (with the exception of the Union
of South Africa) voted against it?...And that, when the vote was
cast in plenary session on 29 November 1947, urgent American pressures
(which a member of the Truman cabinet described as "bordering
onto scandal") had succeeded in prevailing only upon one
African country (Liberia), both of which had special vulnerability
to American pressures, to abandon their declared opposition?...And
that, in other words, the "Jewish State" was planted
at the point-of-intersection of Asia and Africa without the free
approval of any Middle Eastern, Asian or African country except
that Union of South Africa, itself ruled by an alien minority?
13
- THAT, Israel remained, ever since its inception, a total stranger
in the emerging world of Afro-Asia; and that Israel has been refused
admission to any inter-state conference of Asian, African, Afro-Asian,
or Non-Aligned States ever held?
14
- THAT, since the General Armistice Agreements were signed in
1949, Israel has maintained an aggressive policy of waging military
attacks across the Armistice Demarcation Lines, repeatedly invading
the territories of the neighboring Arab States...And that Israel
has been duly rebuked, censured, or condemned for these military
attacks by the Security Council of the General Assembly of the
United Nations on eleven occasions-five times by the Security
Council and six times by the General Assembly?
15
- THAT, no other country in the world, whether member of the United
Nations or non-member, has been so frequently condemned by the
United Nations?
16
- THAT, no Arab State has ever been condemned by any organ of
the United Nations for military attacks upon Israel?
17
- THAT, besides expelling the bulk of the Arab inhabitants of
Palestine, and besides constantly attacking the neighboring Arab
States, Israel has also consistently harassed the United Nations
observers and other personnel stationed along the Armistice Demarcation
Lines: It has assassinated the first United Nations Mediator and
his military aide; it has detained some truce observers; it has
militarily occupied and illegally searched the Headquarters of
United Nations personnel; and it has boycotted meetings of the
Mixed Armistice Commissions?...
18
- THAT, Israel has additionally imposed a system of apartheid
upon the Arabs who stayed in their homeland? More than 90% of
these Arabs live in "security zones;" they alone live
under martial law, restricting their freedom to travel from village
to village or from town to town; their children are denied equal
opportunities for education; and they are denied decent opportunities
for work, and the right to receive "equal pay for equal work?"
19
- THAT, notwithstanding the foregoing facts, Israel has always
been, and still is, widely portrayed in the Western press as the
"bastion of democracy" and the "champion of peace"
in the Middle East?
20
- THAT, the Western Powers have persisted in declaring their determination
to ensure a so-called "arms balance" in the area, as
between Israel, on the one hand, and the one-hundred million inhabitants
of the thirteen Arab States, on the other hand?... And this unilateral
Western doctrine of so-called "arms balance" is no more
reasonable than the suggestion that, in the Cuba-U.S.A conflict,
there should be "arms balance" as between Cuba and the
United States... or that the whole Continent of Africa should
not be allowed to acquire more
arms than South Africa... or that Mainland China should not be
permitted to have more arms than Taiwan... or that the military
allowed to acquire more arms than South Africa... and that only
thus can peace be safeguarded in the Western Hemisphere, in Africa,
in Asia, or in Europe?...
21
– THAT, Israel allots 85% of the water resources in the occupied
territories for Jews and the remaining 15% is divided among all
Palestinians in the territories? For example in Hebron, 85% of
the water is given to about 500 settlers, while 15% must be divided
among Hebron's 120,000 Palestinians?
22
– THAT, The United States awards Israel $3 billion in aid each
year, more than to any other country in the world: US aid to Israel
exceeds the aid the US grants to the whole sub-Sahara Africa?
23
– THAT, GDP, per capita, and consumption per capita in the Occupied
Territories have dropped about 15 percent in the West Bank and
Gaza since 1993 - that's even with large foreign assistance pouring
in, from Europe, mostly?
24
– THAT, Up until 1993, the U.S. and Israel permitted humanitarian
aid to come into the territories. UN humanitarian aid was permitted
into the West Bank and Gaza. In 1993, that was restricted?
25
– THAT, Israel is the only country in the Middle East that has
nuclear weapons?
26
– THAT, Israel is the only country in the Middle East that refuses
to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and bars international
inspections from its sites?
27
– THAT, Israel currently occupies territories of two sovereign
nations (Lebanon and Syria) in defiance of United Nations Security
Council resolutions?
28
– THAT, High-ranking military officers in the Israeli Defense
Forces have admitted publicly that unarmed prisoners of war were
executed by the IDF?
29
– THAT, Israel refuses to prosecute its soldiers who have acknowledged
executing prisoners of war?
30
– THAT, Israel routinely confiscates bank accounts, businesses,
and land from Palestinians and refuses to pay compensation to
those who suffer the confiscation?
31
– THAT, Israel stands in defiance of 69 United Nations Security
Council Resolutions?
32
– THAT, Israel's current prime minister, Ariel Sharon, was found
by an Israeli court to be "personally responsible" for
the Sabra and Shatilla massacres in Lebanon in which thousands
of unarmed Palestinian refugees were slaughtered in 1982?
33
– THAT, Today's Israel sits on the former sites of more than 400
destroyed Palestinian villages, and that the Israelis renamed
almost every physical site in the country to cover up the traces?
34
– THAT, Ariel Sharon's coalition government includes a party --
Molodet -- which advocates expelling all [of the over two million]
Palestinians from [their homes in] the occupied territories?
35
– THAT, Israel's illegal settlement-building in the Occupied Palestinian
territories more than doubled doubled in the eight years since
the Oslo agreements?
36
– THAT, Illegal settlement building under Prime Minister Barak
doubled compared to settlement building under Prime Minister Netanyahu?
37
– THAT, More illegal settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories
were built under Prime Minister Barak than at any other time in
the history of Israel's occupation of Palestinian land?
38
– THAT, Despite a ban on torture by Israel's High Court of Justice,
torture has continued by Shin Bet interrogators on Palestinian
prisoners?
39
– THAT, Palestinian refugees make up the largest refugee population
in the world?
40
– THAT, Israeli military checkpoints surround every Palestinian
population center in violation of the Oslo Accords?
41
– THAT, The right of self-determination is guaranteed to every
human being under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (December,
1948), yet Palestinians were/are expected to negotiate for this
right under the Oslo Accords?
42
– THAT, Palestinians have the highest ratio of PhDs per capita
in the world?