Report on Palestinian-Israeli conflict Opinion Columns

published in

The Boston Globe

between

October 6, 2000 and March 6, 2001

 

 

Palestine Media Watch

 

http://www.pmwatch.org

 

03/20/2001

 

 

 

1.             Introduction

 

This report provides a breakdown of opinion columns on the Middle East crisis published by The Boston Globe between October 6, 2000 and March 6, 2001.

 

This report examines in some detail the content of these columns.

 

 

2.             The Editorial Board

 

The members of The Boston Globe editorial board are:

·        [EDITORIAL BOARD HERE]

 

 

3.             The Columns

 

During the period that is the focus of this report, The Post published forty-five (45) opinion articles, the first of which was published on October 9, 2000:

 

Date

Title

03/06/2001

An exercise of hope in a season of despair

02/26/2001

America's tense ties with Syria

02/19/2001

The Likud precedent

01/31/2001

A missed opportunity in the Mideast?

01/08/2001

When Jerusalem was divided (Part II)

01/04/2001

A season of mayhem

01/04/2001

Slice up Jerusalem? Unthinkable

12/30/2001

Arafat won't have Clinton to hold his hand

12/26/2001

A renewed impulse for peace in a land touched by God

12/25/2001

Israel must respect the Palestinians

12/23/2001

Heroes for Mideast peace

11/23/2001

As peace process lives, Mideast peace is dying

11/20/2001

'Peace process' in Middle East brings only war

10/24/2001

The harsh realities of Mideast deadlock

10/13/2001

Arafat's green light to terrorists

10/08/2001

All Jamal wanted for his son was a peaceful world

 

 

4.             Op-Ed Authors

 

 

Author

No. published

 

 

James Carroll

3

Jeff Jacoby

3

H.D.S Greenway

2

Helen Schary Motro

2

Mazin B. Qumsiyeh

2

Abraham T. Allison

1

Geoffry Aronson

1

Uri Dromi

1

Mary McGrory

1

 

 

 

 

5.             Column Breakdown

 

In the table below, pro-Israeli articles are identified as “pro-Isr” and pro-Palestinian articles are identified as “pro-Pal.”  Balanced articles are indicated as such.

 

The terms were defined as follows:

 

Pro-Israeli: 

A pro-Israeli column is one that analyzes the conflict solely from an Israeli viewpoint, without significant mention of Palestinian suffering or Israeli human rights abuses.  Such columns might include those that define Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s Camp David positions as generous, those that criticize Palestinians for using violence without taking note of disproportionate Israeli violence, and those that advance appeals to ethnicity or religion as a basis for analyzing the conflict.

 

Pro-Palestinian:

A pro-Palestinian column is one that analyzes the conflict solely from a Palestinian viewpoint, without significant mention of Israeli viewpoints.

 

Balanced:

A balanced column is one that recognizes, in one way or another, that both Palestinians and Israelis have a set of positions and opinions regarding the conflict that Americans must analyze before reaching any conclusions.

 

Date

Type

03/06/2001

Balanced

02/26/2001

Pro-Isr

02/19/2001

Pro-Isr

01/31/2001

Balanced

01/08/2001

Pro-Isr

01/04/2001

Pro-Pal

01/04/2001

Pro-Isr

12/30/2001

Pro-Isr

12/26/2001

Balanced

12/25/2001

Balanced

12/23/2001

Balanced

11/23/2001

Pro-Pal

11/20/2001

Pro-Isr

10/24/2001

Balanced

10/13/2001

Pro-Isr

10/08/2001

Balanced

 

 

 

 

Space

 

 

No. columns (of 45 total)

Percentage of total

 

 

 

Pro-Israeli

7

43.75%

Pro-Palestinian

2

12.50%

Balanced

7

43.75%

 

 

Gaps

 

 

No. weeks

 

 

Longest gap between pro-Israeli columns

11

Longest gaps between pro-Palestinian columns

5

 

 

6.             Analysis

 

 

During the 23-week period beginning October 6, 2000 and ending March 6, 2001, The Boston Globe dedicated almost four times as much column space in its op-ed pages for pro-Israeli columns than for pro-Palestinian columns.  .

 

Particularly disturbing is the fact that there were no pro-Palestinian perspectives published in the crucial first eight weeks of the crisis (September 28-November 23).  One had to wait until well into the crisis, in November 23, for a pro-Palestinian piece to be published.

 

Equally disturbing is the fact that there has been no pro-Palestinian pieces published since January 4, 2001. That is, at this time of writing, it has been at least 11 weeks since the last pro-Palestinian column was published.  This means that no pro-Palestinian columns have been published since Ariel Sharon’s election.  This is especially remarkable given that the election of Ariel Sharon has been greatly upsetting to the Palestinian side.

 

On the positive side, The Boston Globe has offered substantial space for balanced opinion pieces.  In fact, it has provided as much space for balanced pieces as it has for pro-Israeli pieces.

 

7.             Conclusions

 

The Boston should offer its readers as many diverse opinions on the Middle East crisis as it can spare in its opinion pages.  Readers entitled to hear all arguments from all involved parties. 

 

In the future, The Boston Globe should work to provide its readers with equal exposure to the pro-Palestinian, pro-Israeli, and balanced perspectives.