Palestine Media Watch
HOME  |  ACT  |  MENTIONS  |  DONATE |  VOLUNTEER |   DEBATE | ADVISORY BOARD |  ABOUT   |  CONTACT | 
 
 

"Illegal" only when Israel says so


PMWATCH -- October 21, 2002 -- Four months ago, we issued an alert on an erratum published by the Seattle Times -- http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/cast/seattletimes.asp -- in which the Times wrote the following:

Information in this article, originally published May 14, was corrected May 24. An earlier version of this story in which an Israeli human-rights group - B'Tselem - criticized Israel's policy on settlements in the West Bank referred to the settlements as illegal under international law. While the legality of the settlements is a point of high contention in the Middle East conflict, the settlements have not been ruled illegal in a court of law. [See below for a link and the whole article]

As we pointed out in that alert, the High Contracting Parties of the Geneva Conventions have time and again said that they "reaffirm the illegality of the settlements in the said territories and the extension thereof." This is not to mention the various UN resolutions on the matter of settlements, e.g., 465, 446, 452, 465 -- for more, see: http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/snakebite/UN.html

And yet, very rarely does a news item on the conflict appearing in the US media ever describe the settlements in the Occupied Territories as "illegal". Indeed, as we discovered in a study we published on June 17, 2002 -- http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/reports/ap/ap061702.html -- "a Lexis-Nexis search of AP Online wire reports posted throughout the entire year of 2001 showed a total of 1,318 feeds mentioning the West Bank and/or the Gaza Strip in the text. However, just 29 of those feeds (or 2%) also informed readers in the same text that Israel currently occupies those lands." In other words, the West Bank and Gaza, along with Jerusalem, are referred to as "occupied" extremely rarely, let alone as "illegally occupied"!

But now, all of a sudden, We read stories such as the one below from AP where the word "illegal" is used with gusto, no less than five times in the span of a few paragraphs. Why the sudden turn to a legal vocabulary? Why is the legal status of Israeli settlements important? Simply because Official Israel is using the word "illegal" to describe what it calls "outposts". And so, the US media, dutifully following suit, is now using the word "illegal" -- though making sure that it uses it only when followed by the word "outpost" or "outposts". (Note also that what is a matter of fact in international law, the fact that the settlements in the Occupied Territories are illegal -- even the United States holds the official position that they are illegal -- is talked about in the piece as something that is a mere opinion that Palestinians hold.)

Note also how the media is playing up the dismantlment of these "outposts", with blown up pictures of "clashes" between soldiers and settlers (clashes, by the way, where no one is killed by "errant bullets" and "stray shells").

Is this the best that the allegedly "independent" media can do -- fretfully and carefully take cues from the Government of Israel about how to cover the conflict?

Please consider calling your newspaper or your favorite media outlet and raise this most important issue with them. How can they explain this dutiful deference to the Israeli government, even when doing so means ignoring unamiguous international law, US official policy, universal norms, and basic common sense?

Media contact info is at: http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/contact/media.html.

The main ones to call are:

    The Associated Press:
    New York Headquarters: Tel 212-621-1500 Fax 212-621-7523 Washington Bureau: Tel 202-776-9400 Fax 202-776-9570 National Public Radio Address 635 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington DC 20001 Tel 202-513-2000 Fax 202-513-3329 Letters yourturn@npr.org Ombudsman Jeffrey Dvorkin ombudsman@npr.org Foreign Editor Loren Jenkins ljenkins@npr.org 202-414-2298 Israel/OT Correspondent Linda Gradstein lgradstein@npr.org CNN Headquarters Address One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta GA 30303 Tel 404-827-1500 Fax 404-827-1906 Email cnn.feedback@cnn.com community@cnn.com Washington Post Address 1150 15th St, NW, Washington DC 20071 Tel 202-334-6000 Fax 202-496-3883 Letters letters@washpost.com (Martha McAteer, letters editor) Ombudsman Michael Getler ombudsman@washpost.com 202-334-7582 Foreign Editor David Hoffman 202-334-5553 Asst Foreign Editors Philip Bennett bennettp@washpost.com , USA Today Address 7950 Jones Branch Dr, McLean VA 22108 Tel 800-872-0001 or 703-854-3400 Op-Ed Editor Glen Nishimura gnishimura@usatoday.com New York Times Address 229 W 43rd St, New York NY 10036 Tel 212-556-1234 (DC bureau: 202-862-0300) Fax 212-556-3690/3622
You can also send your message to the media through the interface below. Enter your letter and then press: "send".

Palestine Media Watch
http://www.pmwatch.org

 
Your email address
Your first name
Your last name
City
State
Country
Subject

Your letter

 

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=514&ncid=514&e=6&u=/ap/20021020/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians_7557

Jewish Settlers Clash With Police
Sun Oct 20,11:24 AM ET
By LAURIE COPANS, Associated Press Writer

JERUSALEM (AP) - The eviction of Jewish settlers from an illegal outpost ignited tempers Sunday with Israel's defense minister accusing settlers of a "revolt," while a religious party threatened to quit the coalition government because the operation began on the Jewish sabbath.

About 400 Jewish settlers and hundreds of police and soldiers scuffled Saturday night as army bulldozers tried to uproot two structures at the Havat Gilad outpost near the West Bank city of Nablus. Twelve police officers and 10 settlers suffered mostly light injuries, rescue officials said.

The confrontation came two nights after the security forces removed settlers from the same rocky hilltop outpost. It was established a year ago after a settler was shot dead by Palestinian militants nearby.

Several hundred settlers returned Sunday morning in an attempt to prevent soldiers from bulldozing one remaining structure, a makeshift synagogue, Army Radio reported. Settlers burned tires and threw water bottles at soldiers in an effort to keep them back, but the soldiers eventually took it down.

Dozens of illegal settler outposts have sprung up around the West Bank. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon (news - web sites) says it will not allow new settlements to be built, but will permit the nearly 150 government-authorized settlements to expand.

Palestinians want all settlements removed, and are claiming all the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (news - web sites) for a future state. Palestinians say the settlements are illegal under international law since they are built on land Israel captured during the 1967 Middle East war.

Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat (news - web sites) on Sunday urged the United States to force Israel to pull out of the Palestinian areas during a visit this week of U.S. envoy William Burns.

The settlement issue will be one of the most difficult to resolve in any Mideast peace agreement.

The army operation at the outpost began just after the Jewish Sabbath ended at sundown Saturday, but the soldiers began preparations earlier in the day.

That sparked angry criticism by religious members of Sharon's coalition government, who complained that the soldiers had to leave their bases before the end of the sabbath.

Israeli law prevents government activity from sunset Friday to sunset Saturday in accordance with Jewish law — although there is an allowance for security needs which has translated into regular army activity on sabbath in the past. Violations of the Sabbath have caused government crises in the past.

Shaul Yaalom, a lawmaker of the National Religious Party, said he would recommend his party withdraw from the coalition if Sharon does not order an investigation into why the operation began before the end of the sabbath.

Effie Eitam, leader of the NRP, demanded that Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer resign over the violation of the sabbath. Ben-Eliezer, in response, warned that he would quit if Sharon did not voice support for the decision to evacuate the outposts.

Ben-Eliezer warned of civil strife if settler leaders didn't rein in their constituents.

"The revolt of the settlers against authority is a danger to our existence," he told Israel Radio.

Apparently fearing a crisis, Sharon condemned the timing of the evacuation but called for settlers to leave illegal outposts peacefully.

"I want to express great sorrow in my name and the entire Cabinet for the unnecessary, mass violation of the sabbath that was imposed on hundreds of soldiers when they evacuated Havat Gilad," Sharon told his Cabinet Sunday.

In a rare criticism of settlers, Sharon also condemned their refusal to evacuate the Havat Gilad outpost.

"A number of very grave statements were made here, and the most serious thing of all was violence against soldiers and the security forces," Sharon told the Cabinet. "There is no issue which justifies violence against soldiers and the security forces."

Ben-Eliezer announced this month that the illegal outposts would be dismantled. Of 30 slated for evacuation, 20 have already been taken down, said Amikam Tzirsky, an aide to Ben-Eliezer on settlement affairs.

Meanwhile, Ben-Eliezer said the army was trying to work out a deal with the Palestinians by which Israeli troops would pull out of West Bank areas they took over in June after suicide bombings in Israel.

Ben-Eliezer said last week that the army would pull out of the West Bank city of Hebron if the situation remained calm. Israeli radios reported that Sharon, Ben-Eliezer and security officials decided in a meeting Sunday that the army would begin thinning troops in the city in the coming days.

The Israeli army lifted the long-running curfew for several hours in the West Bank cities of Nablus, Tulkarem and Ramallah on Sunday, the army said.

   
HOME |  ACT  |  MENTIONS  |  DONATE |  VOLUNTEER |   DEBATE | ADVISORY BOARD |  ABOUT  |  CONTACT |